Minimalist's FY26 accounts were reported on 17 August. Revenue from operations rose 36% to ₹690.2 crore. Total income came to ₹697.4 crore.
Profit after tax was ₹25.9 crore. That is the brand's first full year in profit, and its first full year owned by Hindustan Unilever.
The cost line that moved most was advertising. It rose 55% to about ₹235 crore, more than 35% of everything the company spent in the year.
HUL paid a pre-money enterprise value of ₹2,955 crore for 90.5% of Uprising Science, the parent company, in a deal that closed in April 2025. Against FY26 revenue, that is roughly 4.3 times sales.
For the next D2C brand waiting on a strategic buyer, the question is whether that multiple survives contact with the advertising bill needed to hold the growth.
EBITDA more than doubled to about ₹40.2 crore. Profit before tax and exceptional items rose to ₹32.5 crore from ₹11.9 crore a year earlier. The profit is real and it is thin — under 4% of income.
The advertising number is best read as the price of attention. Minimalist grew up on ingredient-led content and its own website, selling to people who came looking. Under HUL it competes for the same shelf and the same feed as brands with fifty years of distribution behind them. Spending 35 paise of every rupee to stay visible is what that fight costs at this size.
The sharper comparison is FY25, when revenue grew 48% to ₹515 crore with no profit. Growth slowed to 36% in the first full year under the new owner, and profit appeared. Whether the same trade shows up in HUL's other acquired brands is what the next two prints will settle.